Anwar’s Appointment of Thaksin Shinawatra as Adviser Sparks Debate in Malaysia

SINGAPORE – Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s decision to appoint former Thai premier Thaksin Shinawatra as an “informal adviser” for Malaysia’s upcoming chairmanship of Asean in 2025 has stirred significant debate. While some Malaysian officials view it as a strategic move to harness Thaksin’s extensive regional experience, critics question the choice due to his controversial past.

“I have agreed to appoint Thaksin as my informal adviser on chairing Asean, with a team of members from Asean countries in an informal set-up,” Mr. Anwar stated during an official meeting with Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra on Dec 16 at Putrajaya.

Thaksin, who returned to Thailand in 2023 after over a decade in self-exile to avoid corruption charges, has faced criticism for his record, including a conviction for abuse of power. Yet, Malaysian Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan highlighted Thaksin’s influence in key global arenas, including the US and China, as a potential asset.

“Thaksin’s network positions him as a bridge for Asean,” Mr. Hasan remarked, emphasizing the potential to enhance diplomatic ties and address the region’s challenges, such as the Myanmar crisis and navigating power dynamics involving the US, China, and Russia.

The move, however, has faced pushback from opposition figures, including PAS information chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari, who called the decision unprecedented. Former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad also voiced reservations, questioning why a foreign figure with legal controversies was chosen.

Supporters argue Thaksin’s leadership experience and prior relationships with Myanmar’s military leaders could help formulate a peace strategy in the region. Detractors worry it reflects a lack of confidence in Malaysia’s own diplomatic capabilities and raises questions about the informal advisory group’s influence on Asean policy.

As Malaysia prepares for its pivotal role in 2025, Anwar’s bold move continues to evoke a mixture of anticipation and skepticism among regional and domestic observers.